Why college should not be free

 
Opponents of free college argue that it would strain public budgets and compel taxpayers to pay more taxes to fund the program (Lane, 2015). As a result, it would lead to a shortage of access. According to Lane (2015), free tuition would make higher education accessible to many people but less excellent because of difficulties in administering flooded colleges. In addition, students could flood the system and make it ineffective or raise costs (Lane, 2015). High costs would necessitate further federal subsidies that could mean a higher burden for taxpayers. Free tuition could also lower the quality of education because available resources would have to be shared or distributed among many students (Lane, 2015). This argument is supported by the argument that even though German offers free college educations, none of its institutions features among the top 50 globally. The quality of education is not great but good.

Receive an exclusive paper on any topic without plagiarism in only 3 hours
VIEW MORE
Conclusion
Education is one of the most important backbones of a prosperous nation. Therefore, it is important for young people to get access to quality and affordable education. Higher education in America is very expensive. The high cost stops many people from pursuing it and improving the quality of their lives. Benefits of the free college include reduction of cases of student loans fraud, expansion of the middle class, individuals from low-income families and minority groups would get access, and students would experience more positive educational outcomes. On the contrary, it would increase the burden on the fiscal budget and compel taxpayers to pay more. In addition, it would increase access but lower the quality of education.

References
Lane, C. (2015). College Doesn’t Need to Be Free. Web.

Page, M., & Clawson, D. (n.d). It’s Time to Push for Free College. Web