Relationship of Human Happiness and Misery to Virtue Ethics in Aristotle’s Theory

 
Dalrymple claimed that the main difference between misery and human happiness is the
decisions made by individuals. He claimed that no biological characteristic can make a
distinction between depression and unhappiness. The author attested that happiness and misery
are recognized as emotional responses to the peoples’ decisions. Human happiness and misery
are based on the decisions that people make. Aristotle claimed that the main goal of human
beings is happiness. People do not find true happiness because it is connected to virtues. Many
individuals lack virtues which reduces their happiness. Dalrymple argues happiness is linked to
the choices made by individuals but Aristotle claims that happiness is influenced by virtue.
Reasons for Dalrymple’s Argument
I am convinced by Dalrymple’s argument in various ways. I informed my parents that I had
depression when I did pass my examinations. I consulted a psychiatrist but found that I was
angry and perceived negative attitude due to the things I encountered in my life. I was increasing
emotions rather than principles which led to the failure of being accountable for the activities I
carried out in life. After accepting my responsibilities, I am capable of handling my emotions
under different circumstances.
I support Dalrymple’s argument that evil is present in all people but it is dependent on the
scope of its display. The state carries out corrupt activities but encourages individual to refrain
from wicked actions. Everyone has a free will to make the right decision on whether to carry out
illegal actions